Learn how to claim depreciation on assets used in R&D activities under Australia's R&D Tax Incentive. Covers ATO rules, eligibility, calculation
For many Australian businesses undertaking research and development, the R&D Tax Incentive can meaningfully reduce the after-tax cost of innovation. One area that often creates confusion is how to handle the assets used in your R&D activities, equipment, machinery, software, and in certain circumstances even portions of a building. Under the program, you may be eligible to claim a notional deduction for the decline in value (commonly called depreciation) of those assets. This is not a separate cash payment; rather, it is an allowable deduction that reduces your taxable income and can improve your R&D tax offset position, potentially generating a refundable offset for smaller companies.
Across our work at GrantsMAX, we see business owners and their accountants wrestling with the complexity of asset depreciation for R&D. Our job is to help you prepare a thorough, evidence-backed application pack straight from your own accounting data, so your registered tax agent can review, refine, and lodge the claim knowing the foundation is solid, while you always remain the owner of the claim. This guide walks through the mechanics in a step-by-step format, drawing on official ATO and AusIndustry guidance. Remember, this is general information only and does not constitute tax, financial, or legal advice. Always confirm your specific circumstances with a registered tax professional.
If you are new to the R&D Tax Incentive, a good starting point is our plain-English guide on What is the R&D Tax Incentive?. To see how GrantsMAX discovers grants and incentives from your Xero, MYOB, or QuickBooks data, visit our homepage.
Before you can include a decline-in-value deduction in an R&D tax claim, a few foundational pieces must be in place:
With these prerequisites satisfied, you can move through the following steps.
Your first practical task is to list every depreciating asset that is used, or has been used, in your R&D. This can include:
The common thread is that the asset must be used for the purpose of carrying on an eligible R&D activity. If an asset serves multiple purposes, you will apportion its usage later (Step 4).
Pro tip: Walk through your fixed asset register and flag any items that have been tagged to R&D projects, even loosely. In a manufacturing plant, agtech facility, or software development house, a surprising number of assets may be partially used for R&D.
Warning: Do not assume an asset qualifies simply because it is new or technologically advanced. The ATO looks at the actual use, not the potential. General office furniture, administrative computers, or assets used exclusively for production or sales are unlikely to be eligible. The ATO’s own page on Expenditure you can claim provides examples of qualifying and non-qualifying assets.
Academic research has explored how firms allocate depreciation to R&D. One study analysed the proportion of firm-wide depreciation attributable to long-lived R&D assets, highlighting the value of careful attribution. While that research uses international data, the principle holds: precise identification is the first step.
The R&D Tax Incentive distinguishes between core and supporting activities, and the treatment of asset depreciation depends on this classification. Core activities must satisfy the statutory test: they are experimental activities whose outcome cannot be known or determined in advance on the basis of current knowledge, and they are conducted for the purpose of generating new knowledge. Supporting activities are those that have a direct, close, and relatively immediate relationship with a core activity.
Assets used in core activities may be fully attributable to the R&D claim, subject to apportionment if they also serve non-R&D purposes. For assets used in supporting activities, however, the bar is higher. According to AusIndustry guidance, the asset must be used predominantly (more than 50%) for the supporting activity, and the supporting activity itself must be for the dominant purpose of supporting a core R&D activity.
Example: A 3D printer used to produce experimental prototypes as part of a core manufacturing R&D project could be fully eligible. If the same printer is used only to print jigs and fixtures for the production line (a supporting activity), you would then need to assess whether that supporting activity meets the dominant purpose test. If the supporting activity is not eligible, the asset’s depreciation may not be claimable.
While the Australian definitions are unique, the distinction between qualifying and non-qualifying expenditures is a common thread in global R&D incentives. A KBKG analysis of U.S. qualifying activities shows a similar emphasis on direct use. For Australia, however, you must rely solely on AusIndustry and ATO guidance.
Pro tip: Document the specific purpose of each asset in your R&D plan or project documentation. This will help you, and, later, your accountant or the ATO, understand why a particular asset was essential to the experiment.
Once you have identified the assets and their R&D purpose, you need to calculate their decline in value for the income year. The ATO recognises two methods for depreciating assets:
For general tax purposes, you can usually choose either method. But under the R&D Tax Incentive, the notional deduction must be calculated using the prime cost method, regardless of the method you use for your normal tax depreciation. This rule is set out in the ATO’s Expenditure you can claim guidance, which you should review for the income year in question. For example, even if you claim depreciation on a piece of equipment at 30% diminishing value in your tax return, the R&D notional deduction will be based on a straight-line calculation over the asset’s effective life.
Effective life: You must determine the effective life of each asset in accordance with ATO schedules. The ATO publishes effective life tables for various asset categories; you may self-assess an effective life if you have evidence to support a different period, but the ATO can challenge your assessment. A reasonable and consistent approach is critical.
Broader accounting perspectives on depreciating assets used for R&D can also be helpful. The Embark blog discusses best practices in R&D cost allocation, though your Australian claim must always follow the ATO’s specific requirements. Similarly, the U.S. approach to amortising R&D costs under Section 174, as explained by Thomson Reuters, may offer general conceptual background but does not apply here.
Temporary full expensing and other government measures can also affect how you treat assets. When such measures are in place, they may interact with the R&D notional deduction; you should discuss this with your tax agent, as the rules can be complex and subject to year-by-year adjustments.
Warning: Avoid double-counting. The R&D notional deduction is not an extra deduction on top of whatever you already claim for depreciation; it is an alternative calculation that feeds into your R&D offset. Your registered tax agent will ensure the tax position is correct.
Most assets are not used exclusively for R&D. The ATO requires that you apportion the decline in value on a fair and reasonable basis between R&D use and other use. For instance, if a laboratory oscilloscope is used 60% of the time for eligible R&D experiments and 40% for routine product testing (which may not be eligible R&D), only 60% of the notional deduction can be included in your R&D claim.
The ATO accepts several apportionment methods:
You must keep detailed records to support your chosen method (see Step 5). A reasonable estimate may be acceptable, but only if you can demonstrate the underlying basis with contemporaneous documentation.
Pro tip: Set up a simple usage log or use project tracking codes in your accounting software from the start. If you use Xero tracking categories or MYOB jobs, GrantsMAX can read these data points to help build an evidence trail, a key input to our Audit-Ready Evidence Trail feature.
International comparisons can illustrate how seriously tax authorities treat apportionment. Bloomberg Tax provides a comprehensive look at U.S. R&D credit rules, which also require allocation. But the ATO’s expectations are explicit: you must be able to show the nexus between the asset and the R&D activity. Vague percentage allocations without backing will not survive a review.
Substantiation is the backbone of a defensible R&D claim, and asset depreciation is one of the most scrutinised areas. The ATO can review your claim up to four years after lodgement and will ask for evidence that the assets existed, were used in R&D, and were depreciated correctly. The records you should keep include:
What the ATO expects: Contemporaneous records, those created at the time the work was performed, carry the most weight. The ATO’s guidance on record keeping for the R&D Tax Incentive is clear: reconstruction after the fact is risky.
The U.S. perspective also highlights this. A SourceAdvisors article on non-qualifying activities emphasises that even if an asset is used in R&D, poor documentation can undermine the credit. The same principle applies in Australia.
How GrantsMAX can assist: When you use GrantsMAX, our AI scans your connected accounting data, emails, invoices, and timesheets to construct a supporting-evidence index. It ties each asset and cost line to its source, building a clear audit trail. The pack is then handed off to your registered tax agent through our Accountant Review & Lodge Workflow, where they can add notes, request more evidence, and prepare for lodgement. This does not remove your responsibility to keep good records, but it can dramatically reduce the time and stress of pulling everything together.
Warning: If you cannot substantiate the depreciation claim, the ATO may disallow the entire deduction and potentially impose penalties. Over-documenting is far safer than under-documenting.
Once you have calculated the decline in value for each eligible asset, you include it as part of your aggregate notional R&D deductions when lodging your company tax return and R&D schedule. The process involves:
The ATO does not allow an unlimited deduction. There are caps on total notional deductions, and special rules apply to expenditure incurred with associates. Additionally, you cannot claim for an asset that was retired or sold before it was used for R&D, unless specific transitional rules apply.
Refundable vs non-refundable offset: For companies with an aggregated turnover below a certain threshold (which was $20 million for recent income years, but always confirm the current figure with the ATO), the R&D offset is refundable. This means if the offset exceeds your tax liability, you may receive a cash refund. For larger companies, the offset is non-refundable and can only reduce tax to nil. The refundable status can significantly influence the benefit of claiming depreciation on assets, especially if it creates a cash-flow uplift. Proposed changes to the refundable-offset turnover threshold have been announced but are not yet law; treat any future reform as proposed and consult your tax agent.
Pro tip: Run the numbers. The notional deduction reduces your taxable income, which can affect other tax positions, such as the small business entity concessions. Discuss with your accountant how an R&D claim interacts with your broader tax profile.
For businesses in technology, manufacturing, or other R&D-intensive sectors, the asset classes eligible for depreciation can vary widely. A software company might claim depreciation on high-performance computing hardware used to train machine learning models (if that activity qualifies as core R&D), while a manufacturer might claim on a custom testing rig. Explore our dedicated pages for GrantsMAX for technology companies and GrantsMAX for manufacturers.
The interaction between R&D incentives and depreciation rules is a live topic in tax policy globally. The Weaver blog discusses recent U.S. federal updates on R&D depreciation, illustrating how quickly the landscape can change. In Australia, too, rules evolve, so treat each income year independently and check the latest ATO and AusIndustry publications.
The final, non-negotiable step is professional review. Under the Tax Agent Services Act, only a registered tax agent can charge a fee to prepare and lodge a tax return that includes an R&D claim. Even if you use a tool like GrantsMAX to assemble the supporting data and draft the narrative, the actual lodgement must be performed, or directly supervised, by a registered tax agent. This is the law.
At GrantsMAX, we are not a tax agent. Our platform prepares a complete, evidence-backed application pack: R&D activity descriptions, project narratives, a cost structure pulled from Xero or MYOB, and a supporting-evidence index. We then hand that pack to your registered accountant or tax agent inside a shared workspace. The accountant reviews, refines, and lodges the claim under their professional judgment. You, the business, own the claim and are ultimately responsible for its accuracy.
Why the accountant step is critical for asset depreciation: The depreciation rules we have covered are nuanced, especially around apportionment and the mandatory prime cost method. A competent tax agent will check that:
Using an accountant who is familiar with the R&D Tax Incentive is strongly recommended. If you do not have one, GrantsMAX works with your existing accountant or bookkeeper, or you can engage a tax agent independently. Our Accountant Review & Lodge Workflow makes the collaboration efficient, with clear tracking from Draft to Review to Lodged.
Warning: Never attempt to lodge an R&D claim that includes asset depreciation without professional review. The ATO and the Tax Practitioners Board actively monitor R&D claims; errors can lead to audits, penalties, and reputational damage. It is not worth the risk.
Depreciation of assets used in R&D activities can be a significant component of your R&D Tax Incentive claim, but it demands careful attention to ATO rules and thorough record keeping. To summarise:
If you are ready to explore how GrantsMAX can simplify this process, by connecting to your accounting system, surfacing eligible R&D activities and asset data, and drafting the evidence-backed pack your accountant needs, we invite you to join the GrantsMAX waitlist. We are building a smarter way for Australian businesses to access government funding without the high fees and opacity of legacy consulting, and we would love to have you on board.
Visit GrantsMAX to learn more or see Why GrantsMAX is different. For first-time claimants especially, you may find our page for first-time claimants helpful. And if you are an R&D-active startup, check out GrantsMAX for R&D-active startups.
Disclaimer: This article is general information only, not tax, financial, or legal advice. Eligibility for the R&D Tax Incentive and the correct treatment of asset depreciation depend on your specific circumstances. Always consult a registered tax agent or professional adviser before making a claim. Rules and thresholds change; verify the current ATO and AusIndustry guidance for the relevant income year.